Small. Fast. Reliable.
Choose any three.
WAL-mode File Format
Table Of Contents

This document describes low-level details on how WAL mode is implemented on unix and windows.

The separate file format description provides details on the structure of a database file and of the write-head log file used in WAL mode. But details of the locking protocol and of the format of the WAL-index are deliberately omitted since those details are left to discretion of individual VFS implementations. This document fills in those missing details for the unix and windows VFSes.

For completeness, some of the higher level formatting information contains in the file format document and elsewhere is replicated here, when it pertains to WAL mode processing.

# 1. Files On Disk

When in active use, the state of a WAL mode database is described by three separate files:

1. The main database file with an arbitrary name "X".
2. The write-ahead log file, usually named "X-wal".
3. The wal-index file, usually named "X-shm".

## 1.1. The Main Database File

The format of the main database file is as described in the file format document. The file format version numbers at offsets 18 and 19 into the main database must both be 2 to indicate that the database is in WAL mode. The main database may have an arbitrary name allowed by the underlying filesystem. No special file suffixes are required, though ".db", ".sqlite", and ".sqlite3" seem to be popular choices.

## 1.2. The Write-Ahead-Log or "-wal" File

The write-ahead log or "wal" file is a roll-forward journal that records transactions that have been committed but not yet applied to the main database. Details on the format of the wal file are described in the WAL format subsection of the main file format document. The wal file is named by appending the four characters "-wal" to the end of the name of the main database file. Except on 8+3 filesystems, such names are not allowed, and in that case the file suffix is changed to ".WAL". But as 8+3 filesystems are increasingly rare, that exceptional case can usually be ignored.

## 1.3. The Wal-Index or "-shm" file

The wal-index file or "shm" file is not actually used as a file. Rather, individual database clients mmap the shm file and use it as shared memory for coordinating access to the database and as a cache for quickly locating frames within the wal file. The name of the shm file is the main database file name with the four characters "-shm" appended. Or, for 8+3 filesystems, the shm file is the main database file with the suffix changed to ".SHM".

The shm file does not contain any database content and is not required to recover the database following a crash. For that reason, the first client to connect to a quiescent database will normally truncate the shm file if it exists. Since the content of the shm file does not need to be preserved across a crash, the shm file is never fsync()-ed to disk. In fact, if there were a mechanism by which SQLite could tell the operating system to never persist the shm file to disk but always hold it in cache memory, SQLite would use that mechanism to avoid any unnecessary disk I/O associated with the shm file. However, no such mechanism exists in standard posix.

Because the shm is only used to coordinate access between concurrent clients, the shm file is omitted if exclusive locking mode is set, as an optimization. When exclusive locking mode is set, SQLite uses heap memory in place of the memory-mapped shm file.

## 1.4. File Lifecycles

When a WAL mode database is in active use, all three of the above files usually exist. Except, the Wal-Index file is omitted if exclusive locking mode is set.

If the last client using the database shuts down cleanly by calling sqlite3_close(), then a checkpoint is run automatically in order to transfer all information from the wal file over into the main database, and both the shm file and the wal file are unlinked. Thus, when the database is not in use by any client, it is usually the case that only the main database file exists on disk. However, if the last client did not call sqlite3_close() before it shut down, or if the last client to disconnect was a read-only client, then the final cleanup operation does not occur and the shm and wal files may still exist on disk even when the database is not in use.

## 1.5. Variations

When PRAGMA locking_mode=EXCLUSIVE (exclusive locking mode) is set, only a single client is allowed to have the database open at one time. Since only a single client can use the database, the shm file is omitted. The single client uses a buffer in heap memory as a substitute for the memory-mapped shm file.

If a read/write client invokes sqlite3_file_control(SQLITE_FCNTL_PERSIST_WAL) prior to shutdown, then at shutdown a checkpoint is still run, but the shm file and wal file are not deleted. This allows subsequent read-only clients to connect to and read the database.

# 2. The WAL-Index File Format

The WAL-index or "shm" file is used to coordinate access to the database by multiple clients, and as a cache to help clients quickly locate frames within the wal file.

Because the shm file is not involved in recovery, the shm file does not need to be machine byte-order independent. Hence, numeric values in the shm file are written in the native byte order of the host computer, rather than being converted into a specific cross-platform byte order as is done with the main database file and the wal file.

The shm file consists of one or more hash tables, where each hash table is 32768 bytes in size. Except, a 136-byte header is carved out of the front of the very first hash table, so the first hash table is only 32632 bytes in size. The total size of the shm file is always a multiple of 32768. In most cases, the total size of the shm file is exactly 32768 bytes. The shm file only needs to grow beyond a single hash table if when the wal file grows very large (more than 4079 frames). Since the default automatic checkpoint threshold is 1000, WAL files rarely reach the 4079 threshold needed to make the shm file grow.

## 2.1. The WAL-Index Header

The first 136 bytes of the shm file are a header. The shm header has three main divisions as follows:

WAL-Index Header Divisions

Bytes | Description
--- | ---
0..47 | First copy of the WAL Index Information
48..95 | Second copy of the WAL Index Information
96..135 | Checkpoint Information and Locks

Individual fields of the shm header, except for the salt values copied from the WAL header, are unsigned integers in the native byte-order of the host machine. The salt values are exact copies from the WAL header and are in whatever byte order is used by the WAL file. The size of integers may be 8, 16, 32, or 64 bits. A detailed breakout of the individual fields of the shm header follows:

WAL-Index Header Details

Bytes | Name | Meaning
--- | --- | ---
0..3 | iVersion | The WAL-index format version number. Always 3007000.
4..7 |  | Unused padding space. Must be zero.
8..11 | iChange | Unsigned integer counter, incremented with each transaction.
12 | isInit | The "isInit" flag. 1 when the shm file has been initialized.
13 | bigEndCksum | True if the WAL file uses big-endian checksums. 0 if the WAL uses little-endian checksums.
14..15 | szPage | The database page size in bytes, or 1 if the page size is 65536.
16..19 | mxFrame | Number of valid and committed frames in the WAL file.
20..23 | nPage | Size of the database file in pages.
24..31 | aFrameCksum | Checksum of the last frame in the WAL file.
32..39 | aSalt | The two salt values copied from the WAL file header. These values are in the byte-order of the WAL file, which might be different from the native byte-order of the machine.
40..47 | aCksum | A checksum over bytes 0 through 39 of this header.
48..95 |  | A copy of bytes 0 through 47 of this header.
96..99 | nBackfill | Number of WAL frames that have already been backfilled into the database by prior checkpoints.
100..119 | read-mark[0..4] | Five "read marks". Each read mark is a 32-bit unsigned integer (4 bytes).
120..127 |  | Unused space set aside for 8 file locks.
128..132 | nBackfillAttempted | Number of WAL frames that have attempted to be backfilled but which might not have been backfilled successfully.
132..136 |  | Unused space reserved for further expansion.

### 2.1.1. The mxFrame field

The 32-bit unsigned integer at offset 16 (and repeated at offset 64) is the number of valid frames in the WAL. Because WAL frames are numbered starting with 1, mxFrame is also the index of the last valid commit frame in the WAL. A commit frame is a frame that has a non-zero "size of database" value in bytes 4 through 7 of the frame header, and that indicates the end of a transaction.

When mxFrame field is zero, it indicates that the WAL is empty and that all content should be obtained directly from the database file.

When mxFrame is equal to nBackfill, that indicates that all content in the WAL has been written back into the database. In that case, all content can be read directly from the database. Furthermore, the next writer is free to reset the WAL if no other connections hold locks on WAL_READ_LOCK(N) for N>0.

The mxFrame value is always greater than or equal to both nBackfill and nBackfillAttempted.

### 2.1.2. The nBackfill field

The 32-bit unsigned integer at offset 128 in the WAL-index header is called the "nBackfill". this field holds the number of frames in the WAL file which have been copied back into the main database.

The nBackfill number is never greater than mxFrame. When nBackfill equals mxFrame, that means that the WAL content has been completely written back into the database and it is ok to reset the WAL if there are no locks held on any of WAL_READ_LOCK(N) for N>0.

The nBackfill can only be increased while holding the WAL_CKPT_LOCK. However, nBackfill is changed to zero during a WAL reset, and this happens while holding the WAL_WRITE_LOCK.

### 2.1.3. WAL Locks

Eight bytes of space are set aside in the header to support file locking using the xShmLock() method in the sqlite3_io_methods object. These eight bytes are never read nor written by SQLite since some VFSes (ex: Windows) might implement locks using mandatory file locks.

These are the eight locks supported:

WAL-Index Locks Controlled By xShmLock()

Name | Offset
--- | ---
xShmLock | File
WAL_WRITE_LOCK | 0 | 120
WAL_CKPT_LOCK | 1 | 121
WAL_RECOVER_LOCK | 2 | 122
WAL_READ_LOCK(0) | 3 | 123
WAL_READ_LOCK(1) | 4 | 124
WAL_READ_LOCK(2) | 5 | 125
WAL_READ_LOCK(3) | 6 | 126
WAL_READ_LOCK(4) | 7 | 127

TBD: More information about the header

## 2.2. WAL-Index Hash Tables

The hash tables in the shm file are designed to answer the following question quickly:

> FindFrame(P,M): Given a page number P and a maximum WAL frame index M, return the largest WAL frame index for page P that does not exceed M, or return NULL if there are no frames for page P that do not exceed M.

Let the datatypes "u8", "u16", and "u32" mean unsigned integers of length 8, 16, and 32 bits, respectively. Then, the first 32768-byte unit of the shm file is organized as follows:

>     u8 aWalIndexHeader[136];
>     u32 aPgno[4062];
>     u16 aHash[8192];

The second and all subsequent 32768-byte units of the shm file are like this:

>     u32 aPgno[4096];
>     u16 aHash[8192];

Collectively, the aPgno entries record the database page number stored in all frames of the WAL file. The aPgno[0] entry on the first hash table records the database page number stored in the very first frame in the WAL file. The aPgno[i] entry from the first hash table is the database page number for the i-th frame in the WAL file. The aPgno[k] entry for the second hash table is the database page number for the (k+4062)-th frame in the WAL file. The aPgno[k] entry for the n-th 32768-byte hash table in the shm file (for n>1) holds the database page number stored in the (k+4062+4096*(n-2))-th frame of the WAL file.

Here is a slightly different way to describe the aPgno values: If you think of all aPgno values as a contiguous array, then the database page number stored in the i-th frame of the WAL file is stored in aPgno[i]. Of course, aPgno is not a contiguous array. The first 4062 entries are on the first 32768-byte unit of the shm file and subsequent values are in 4096 entry chunks in later units of the shm file.

One way to compute FindFrame(P,M) would be to scan the aPgno array starting with the M-th entry and working backwards towards the beginning and return J where aPgno[J]==P. Such an algorithm would work, and it would be faster than searching the whole WAL file for the latest frame with page number P. But the search can be made much faster still by using the aHash structure.

A database page number P is mapped into a hash value using the following hash function:

> h = (P * 383)%8192

This function maps every page number into an integer between 0 and 8191 inclusive. The aHash field of each 32768-byte shm file unit maps P values into indexes of the aPgno field of the same unit as follows:

1. Compute the hash value: h = P * 383
2. Let X be the largest set of consecutive integers {h, h+1, h+2, ..., h+N} such that for every j in X, aPgno[j%8192]!=0. The X set will be empty if aPgno[h%8192]==0. The X set is easily computed by starting with the value h%8192, and adding h%8192 to X and incrementing h until encountering the first aPgno[h%8192] entry that is zero.
3. The set X contains the index in aPgno of every entry in the current 32768-byte unit of the shm file that might possibly be a solution to the FindFrame(P,M) function. Each of these entries must be checked separately to ensure that the aPgno value is P and that the frame number does not exceed M. The largest frame number that passes those two tests is the answer.

Each entry in the aPgno array has a single corresponding entry in the aHash array. There are more available slots in aHash than there are in aPgno. The unused slots in aHash are filled with zero. And since there are guaranteed to be unused slots in aHash, that means the loop that computes X is guaranteed to terminate. The expected size of X is less than 2. The worst case is that X will be the same as the number of entries in aPgno, in which case the algorithm runs at about the same speed as a linear scan of aPgno. But that worst case performance is exceedingly rare. Usually, the size of X will be small and the use of the aHash array allows one to compute FindFrame(P,M) much faster.

Here is an alternative way of describing the hash look-up algorithm: Start with h = (P * 383)%8192 and look at aHash[h] and subsequent entries, wrapping around to zero when h reaches 8192, until finding an entry with aHash[h]==0. All aPgno entries having a page number of P will have an index that is one of the aHash[h] values thusly computed. But not all the computed aHash[h] values will meet the matching criteria, so you must check them independently. The speed advantage comes about because normally this set of h values is very small.

Note that each 32768-byte unit of the shm file has its own aHash and aPgno arrays. The aHash array for a single unit is only helpful in finding aPgno entries in that same unit. The overall FindFrame(P,M) function needs to do hash lookups beginning with the latest unit and working backwards to the oldest unit until it finds an answer.

## 2.3. Locking Matrix

Access is coordinated in WAL mode using both the legacy DELETE-mode locks controlled by the xLock and xUnlock methods of the sqlite3_io_methods object and the WAL locks controlled by the xShmLock method of the sqlite3_io_methods object.

Conceptually, there is just a single DELETE-mode lock. The DELETE-mode lock for a single database connection can be in exactly one of the following states:

1. SQLITE_LOCK_NONE (unlocked)
2. SQLITE_LOCK_SHARED (reading)
3. SQLITE_LOCK_RESERVED (reading, waiting to write)
4. SQLITE_LOCK_PENDING (new readers blocked, waiting to write)
5. SQLITE_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE (writing)

The DELETE-mode locks are stored on the lock-byte page of the main database file. Only SQLITE_LOCK_SHARED and SQLITE_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE are factors for WAL-mode databases. The other locking states are used in rollback-mode, but not in WAL-mode.

The WAL-mode locks are described above.

### 2.3.1. How the various locks are used

The following rules show how each of the locks is used.

- SQLITE_LOCK_SHARED

  All connections hold SQLITE_LOCK_SHARED continuously while attached to a WAL-mode database. This is true for both read/write connections and read-only connections. The SQLITE_LOCK_SHARED lock is held even by connections that are not within transaction. This is different from rollback mode, where the SQLITE_LOCK_SHARED is released at the end of each transaction.

- SQLITE_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE

  Connections hold an exclusive lock when changing between WAL mode and any of the various rollback-modes. Connections might also attempt to obtain an EXCLUSIVE lock when they disconnect from WAL mode. If a connection is able to obtain an EXCLUSIVE lock, that means it is the only connection to the database and so it may attempt to checkpoint and then delete the WAL-index and WAL files.

  When a connection is holding a SHARED lock on the main database, that will prevent any other connection from acquiring the EXCLUSIVE lock, which in turn prevents the WAL-index and WAL files from being deleted out from under other users, and prevents a transition out of WAL-mode while other users are accessing the database in WAL-mode.

- WAL_WRITE_LOCK

  The WAL_WRITE_LOCK is only locked exclusively. There is never a shared lock taken on WAL_WRITE_LOCK.

  An EXCLUSIVE WAL_WRITE_LOCK is held by any connection that is appending content to the end of the WAL. Hence, only a single process at a time can append content to the WAL. If a WAL reset occurs as a consequence of a write, then the nBackfill field of the WAL-index header is reset to zero while holding this lock.

  An EXCLUSIVE is also held WAL_WRITE_LOCK, and on several other locking bytes, when a connection is running recovery on the shared WAL-index.

- WAL_CKPT_LOCK

  The WAL_CKPT_LOCK is only locked exclusively. There is never a shared lock taken on WAL_CKPT_LOCK.

  An EXCLUSIVE WAL_CKPT_LOCK is held by any connection that is running a checkpoint. The nBackfill field of the WAL-index header may be increased while holding this exclusive lock, but it may not be decreased.

  An EXCLUSIVE is also held WAL_CKPT_LOCK, and on several other locking bytes, when a connection is running recovery on the shared WAL-index.

- WAL_RECOVER_LOCK

  The WAL_RECOVER_LOCK is only locked exclusively. There is never a shared lock taken on WAL_RECOVER_LOCK.

  An EXCLUSIVE WAL_RECOVER_LOCK is held by any connection that is running recovery to reconstruct the shared WAL-index.

  A read-only connection that is rebuilding its private heap-memory WAL-index does not hold this lock. (It cannot, since read-only connections are not allowed to hold any exclusive locks.) This lock is only held when rebuilding the global shared WAL-index contained in the memory-mapped SHM file.

  In addition to locking this byte, a connection running recovery also gets an exclusive lock on all other WAL locks except for WAL_READ_LOCK(0).

- WAL_READ_LOCK(N)

  There are five separate read locks, numbers 0 through 4. Read locks may be either SHARED or EXCLUSIVE. Connections obtain a shared lock on one of the read locks bytes while they are within a transaction. Connections also obtain an exclusive lock on read locks, one at a time, for the brief moment while they are updating the values of the corresponding read-marks. Read locks 1 through 4 are held exclusively when running recovery.

  Each read lock byte corresponds to one of the five 32-bit read-mark integers located in bytes 100 through 119 of the WAL-index header, as follows:

  Lock Name | Lock offset | Read-mark name | Read-mark offset
  --- | --- | --- | ---
  WAL_READ_LOCK(0) | 123 | read-mark[0] | 100..103
  WAL_READ_LOCK(1) | 124 | read-mark[1] | 104..107
  WAL_READ_LOCK(2) | 125 | read-mark[2] | 108..111
  WAL_READ_LOCK(3) | 126 | read-mark[3] | 112..115
  WAL_READ_LOCK(4) | 127 | read-mark[4] | 116..119

  When a connection holds a shared lock on WAL_READ_LOCK(N), that is a promise by the connection that it will use the WAL and not the database file for any database pages that are modified by the first read-mark[N] entries in the WAL. The read-mark[0] is always zero. If a connection holds a shared lock on WAL_READ_LOCK(0), that means the connection expects to be able to ignore the WAL and read any content it wants from the main database. If N>0 then the connection is free to use more of the WAL file beyond read-mark[N] if it wants to, up to the first mxFrame frames. But when a connection holds a shared lock on WAL_READ_LOCK(0), that is a promise that it will never read content from the WAL and will acquire all content directly from the main database.

  When a checkpoint runs, if it sees a lock on WAL_READ_LOCK(N), then it must not move WAL content into the main database for more than the first read-mark[N] frames. Were it to do so, it would overwrite content that the process holding the lock was expecting to be able to read out of the main database file. A consequence of this is that if the WAL file contains more than read-mark[N] frames (if mxFrame>read-mark[N] for any read-mark for which WAL_READ_LOCK(N) is held by another process), then the checkpoint cannot run to completion.

  When a writer wants to reset the WAL, it must ensure that there are no locks on WAL_READ_LOCK(N) for N>0 because such locks indicate that some other connection is still using the current WAL file and a WAL reset would delete content out from those other connections. It is ok for a WAL reset to occur if other connections are holding WAL_READ_LOCK(0) because by holding WAL_READ_LOCK(0), those other connections are promising not to use any content from the WAL.

### 2.3.2. Operations that require locks and which locks those operations use

- Transition into and out of WAL-mode

  The SQLITE_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE lock must be held by a connection that wants to transition into or out of WAL mode. Transitioning into WAL mode is, therefore, just like any other write transaction, since every write transaction in rollback mode requires the SQLITE_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE lock. If the database file is already in WAL mode (hence if the desire is to change it back into rollback mode) and if there are two or more connections to the database, then each of these connections will be holding an SQLITE_LOCK_SHARED lock. That means that the SQLITE_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE cannot be obtained, and the transition out of WAL mode will not be allowed. This prevents one connection from deleting WAL mode out from under another. It also means that the only way to move a database from WAL mode into rollback mode is to close all but one connection to the database.

- Close a connection to a WAL mode database

  When a database connection closes (via sqlite3_close() or sqlite3_close_v2()), an attempt is made to acquire SQLITE_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE. If this attempt is successful, that means the connection that is closing is the last connection to the database. In that case, it is desirable to clean up the WAL and WAL-index files, so the closing connection runs a checkpoint (while holding SQLITE_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE) and this deletes both the WAL and WAL-index files. The SQLITE_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE is not released until after both the WAL and WAL-index files have been deleted.

  If the application invokes sqlite3_file_control(SQLITE_FCNTL_PERSIST_WAL) on the database connection prior to closing, then the final checkpoint is still run but the WAL and WAL-index files are not deleted as they normally would be. This leaves the database in a state that allows other processes without write permission on the database, WAL, or WAL-index files to open the database read-only. If the WAL and WAL-index files are missing, then a process that lacks permission to create and initialize those files will not be able to open the database, unless the database is designated as immutable using the immutable query parameter.

- Reconstruct the global shared WAL-index during recovery

  All of the WAL-index locks, except for WAL_READ_LOCK(0), are held exclusively while reconstructing the global shared WAL-index during recovery.

- Append a new transaction to the end of the WAL

  An exclusive lock is held on WAL_WRITE_LOCK while adding new frames onto the end of a WAL file.

- Read content from the database and WAL as part of a transaction

- Run a checkpoint

- Reset the WAL file

  A WAL reset means to rewind the WAL and start adding new frames at the beginning. This occurs while appending new frames to a WAL that has mxFrame equal to nBackfill and which has no locks on WAL_READ_LOCK(1) through WAL_READ_LOCK(4). The WAL_WRITE_LOCK is held.

# 3. Recovery

Recovery is the process of rebuilding the WAL-index so that it is synchronized with the WAL.

Recovery is run by the first thread to connect to a WAL-mode database. Recovery restores the WAL-index so that it accurately describes the WAL file. If there is no WAL file present when the first thread connects to the database, there is nothing to recover, but the recovery process still runs to initialize the WAL-index.

If the WAL-index is implemented as a memory-mapped file and that file is read-only to the first thread to connect, then that thread creates a private heap-memory ersazt WAL-index and runs the recovery routine to populate that private WAL-index. The same data results, but it is held privately rather that being written into the public shared memory area.

Recovery works by doing a single pass over the WAL, from beginning to end. The checksums are verified on each frame of the WAL as it is read. The scan stops at the end of the file or at the first invalid checksum. The mxFrame field is set to the index of the last valid commit frame in WAL. Since WAL frame numbers are indexed starting with 1, mxFrame is also the number of valid frames in the WAL. A "commit frame" is a frame that has a non-zero value in bytes 4 through 7 of the frame header. Since the recovery procedure has no way of knowing how many frames of the WAL might have previously been copied back into the database, it initializes the nBackfill value to zero.

During recovery of the global shared-memory WAL-index, exclusive locks are held on WAL_WRITE_LOCK, WAL_CKPT_LOCK, WAL_RECOVER_LOCK, and WAL_READ_LOCK(1) through WAL_READ_LOCK(4). In other words, all locks associated with the WAL-index except for WAL_READ_LOCK(0) are held exclusively. This prevents any other thread from writing the database and from reading any transactions that are held in the WAL, until the recovery is complete.

This page was last updated on 2025-05-10 11:18:57Z